Showing posts with label Villains. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Villains. Show all posts

Friday, December 9, 2016

Worst Disney Villains

            I have not been posting nearly enough this year and I want to steer back from that.  To that end I have found a 30-day blog challenge and fluffed it out to 31 entries (since December has 31 days).  I have done a 30-day challenge before for movies, though that one was poorly executed (I started it in the middle of a month, at one point I posted 2 entries on one day, it is a mess).  I did another one just this year in August on Video Games, that one was better, go read it after this one, all of it.  Or don’t, no pressure.

            Today is day 9 and the topic is “Worst Villain”.
            This is kind of a cop out day because I am surprisingly busy dealing with the uncaring and sometimes outright painful bureaucracy of higher education.  So no massive comparison of 11 candidates and their rankings on the various modes of villainy.

I have mentioned before in this blog that I do not care for “Frozen” and while I have laid too much blame for this at lesser issues, there is something I can say without any difficulty, the movie has a problem with its villains.
            Generally speaking, the movie did not need a bad guy other than Elsa herself.  Her exile resulting in a winter without end is enough of a problem that you did not need another bad guy to drive the plot.  I do not know why they included them but they are there and both of them are just lame.

In this scene, Hans is trying to assassinate Elsa.
Later in the movie the writers assassinate his character potential.
             Hans, the would be lover of Anna who at first appears to be a dashing and competent administrator, giving every indication that he is as swept up with Anna’s annoying charm as Anna is swept up in him being both handsome and not a dick, turns out he is not only a dick but a murderous dick.  This was a misstep.
Hans’ motivation in the story could be tweaked from, “I want to rule a kingdom” over to “I need to save the kingdom if I am to help rule it”; and his role as a physical threat to Elsa could both be done from the perspective of a good person.  For instance, “Elsa, evil or not, is threatening the lives of thousands, I need to stop her even if it means killing her.  I’m sorry.”  It is possible for a good person to do a bad thing for the right reasons, especially if they feel they are cornered and have no choice.  Make him not a villain, but an antagonist who thinks they are the hero.
By making him a good person the rift that trying to kill Elsa would create between Anna and him is good drama.  I have never had to fight, let alone murder a significant other’s sibling to save lives, most good people would never be put in that situation, that’s interesting and not villainous.

You all did not make good use of your Alan Tudyk.
Just like the rest of Hollywood.
The second and even more unnecessary villain is the skinny Duke who sees the opening of the Kingdoms boarders as a chance to make a bank load of money exploiting them financially.  This character belongs in a completely different movie, at no point does his personal greed or desire for trade relations serve any function in the story.  The movie has nothing to do with trade and all of the action takes place in or around this kingdom and no other.  There is no point in the movie in which the Kingdom is mentioned to be poor and in need of new trade partners, wealthy and looking for new products, or afraid of other nations attacking because their closed boarders have alienated the other kingdoms.  Duke is in the wrong movie.
All he does is use his goofy charms, try to have Elsa killed after her dangerous powers are revealed, and then fail to be a factor in the story afterword.  At no point does he make a moral or ethical argument as to why something needed to be done that was informed by his stated motivations.  And aside from his stated motivations of wanting to make money off trade he has no other motivations discussed, mentioned, or illustrated thru his actions.  Apparently witchcraft spooked him.  It also spooked everyone!
The Duke, if you must have him should be the ticking clock element of the story.  That no one knows where Elsa is in the wilds and he sends off mercenaries to kill her, have them be witch-hunters and a real threat rather than just typical nameless soldier-goons.  Anna has to find some backway around those mercenaries and save her sister from them (and them from her) to reach a peaceful solution.  Play up his bigotry toward magic, you could easily have some statue to a wizard in the town square and have him comment on it while walking to the palace, “Wizards and witchcraft.  Makes my skin crawl.”  Boom, motivation established.  You could even have the parents discuss that society has such taboos against magic that they were trying to suppress Elsa’s powers specifically because the other royals would have tried to kill Elsa.  As is, Duke is greedy, but his murderous fear/hatred of magic comes out of nowhere.

Or you could have just had the nads to make Elsa a full on villain.
Again, you don’t need the Duke, he adds nothing.  Hans being the misguided hero and Elsa being the heroine who can’t control her powers because her abusive dipshit parents failed so completely to understand the Trolls’ instructions are more than enough conflict.  You could change to focus on those elements and “Frozen” would still end the same way, with Anna sacrificing herself to save Elsa.

            I talked about both of these things before.  And have a link to it here.  Feel free to see some minor adjustments I suggested—even smaller than those discussed here—would make the movie a lot more complex and interesting.  Rather than how it is now, which is messy.

            Share your own thoughts on this in the comments.  I know I am not the only person out there who is nostalgic for Disney products, and I am sure many people disagree with my selection for today’s entry.
            I picked Disney stuff just because I knew there was so much of it to talk about and it lends itself to discussion in the comments.  So please, tell me how my opinion about cartoon movies is biased and how your opinion on cartoon movies is objectively right.

______________________________

If you like or hate this please take the time to comment, +1, share on Twitter, Tumblr, or Facebook, and otherwise distribute my opinion to the world.  I would appreciate it.

Thursday, December 8, 2016

My Favorite Disney Villain

            I have not been posting nearly enough this year and I want to steer back from that.  To that end I have found a 30-day blog challenge and fluffed it out to 31 entries (since December has 31 days).  I have done a 30-day challenge before for movies, though that one was poorly executed (I started it in the middle of a month, at one point I posted 2 entries on one day, it is a mess).  I did another one just this year in August on Video Games, that one was better, go read it after this one, all of it.  Or don’t, no pressure.

            Today is day 8 and the topic is “Favorite Villain”.  I think I might have gone a little far in some places.

I should get a costume.
            I was thinking about which bad guy immediately jumped out at me and I will say this for Disney, they got great bad guys.  Mostly.  4 immediately jumped to mind with a couple more creeping in around the edges and before I knew it I had a bit of list.  Having to figure out which was to be the top of the pile was going to be difficult, because I analyze everything to death!
So to help me decide I did the nerdiest thing possible and made myself a grading rubric based on 4 criteria and I threw in a secret tie breaker just in case that proved insufficient.  What makes a good villain to me?

1)     Motivation: they are driven by something that makes sense.  They don’t have to be Walter White or Javert but I need to know that the reason they are doing what they are doing is justifiable to them at the very least.
2)     Methodology: what the hell are they going to do to get what they want?  Is it an elaborate scheme, use of force, a quirk of the rules?  Again I am not looking for Iago (The Shakespeare one), just so long as they do something interesting.
3)     Final Confrontation: when the hero makes their last push to stop the bad guy what is it that they are over coming?  What is the villain’s ultimate downfall?  Much like the Emperor spending far too long indulging in cruelty and torture led to him getting throw down into the exploding core of his super weapon, what was the ultimate battle for this Disney icon?
4)     Personality: sometimes the bad guy is just more interesting and fun to be around than the hero.  This can be caused by them having a powerfully charismatic voice actor or just a truly creative design—I would just point to their songs, but that is a topic for later in the month—but I do feel that just being likable is a big part of what makes a bad guy work.

(It does now occur to me that I could have made a solid two-week blog series just on grading villains by this metric.  This version will be super shallow by comparison—something to think about down the line though.)

The Contenders
            I picked the 11 I consider to be both the most iconic and the one’s that leapt most quickly to mind.  This selection process gave a bit of an advantage to those who have voice actors I like, “Hi Shadow Man, voiced by Keith David!”  But, I tried to grab all the ones people would say were the best.  There are too many characters!
I am sure someone out there is bemoaning the lack of Cruella De Ville on this list, but for whatever reason, even though she is the evilest, I couldn’t bring myself to putting someone in the running for “best” or “favorite” anything when they would murder puppies for the sake of a coat.  Sorry.  No.  Too evil.  Go fuck yourself.

In order of appearance:

She is hot.  But in a very stern and put together way.
  • The Queen from “Snow White”
  • Maleficent from “Sleeping Beauty”
  • Ursula from “The Little Mermaid”
  • Gaston from “Beauty and the Beast”
  • Jafar from “Aladdin”
  • Scar from “The Lion King”
  • Judge Frollo from “The Hunchback of Notre Dame”
  • Hades from “Hercules”
  • Syndrome from “The Incredibles”
  • Dr. Facilier AKA Shadow Man from “The Princess and the Frog”
  • Mother Gothel from “Tangled”

In comparison to the Evil Queen, any thug with a heavy rock can kill a child.
Real evil is stealing and raising that child as your own deluded medicine cabinet.

Section 1: Motivation
            There is a reason I start this off with something simple, “What do you want?” should be a pretty easy thing to answer and important in judging how they go about it.  I will try and do this as the characters explaining their own motivations.  There is a lot of, “I should be in charge” nonsense.

From weakest to strongest they are:

The Queen from “Snow White”- “I am the fairest.”

Scar from “The Lion King”- “Why shouldn’t I be King?”

My teeth and ambitions are bared.  Be prepared.
Ursula from “The Little Mermaid” – “I want revenge on Triton for exiling me, and to take control of Atlantis for my own amusement.”

Hades from “Hercules”- “C’mon, does my brother seem the type of guy who should be running the cosmos?  I run a professional organization drawing together those who have the talent to rise up based on their abilities.  I want to make Olympus great again, even if I have to tear it down to do it.”

Jafar from “Aladdin” – “Have you seen that idiot and his brat?  I should be in charge!”
(Jafar is higher than the others because he kind of should replace the Sultan.  Mufasa is ostensibly a good king, so is Zeus and Triton in some measures.)

Mother Gothel from “Tangled”- “Oh sure, I’m the bad guy?  My carefully cultivated magical flower which I have used to treat my own illness and age is stolen and destroyed to save a woman who has lived her entire life in a palace and I’m the bad guy?  I did my best to take back my medicine and have done everything I could to keep the girl who has it safe and happy so that I can STAY ALIVE.  But, sure, I’m the bad guy.”

Maleficent from “Sleeping Beauty” – “I am the most important person in the world and I don’t get an invitation?  I need to teach these people a lesson so that no one ever disrespects me again.”

Dr. Facilier AKA Shadow Man from “The Princess and the Frog”- “I have made many deals in this town, it was the only way to get by.  Maybe you haven’t seen enough of this country to know how rough it gets for guys like me?  Let me tell you, if you don’t have friends you don’t survive, and I want to be a friend to all those who were down with me, I want to make this whole city my friend, to pay me back for all the bad deals I’ve had to live with.”

Syndrome from “The Incredibles” – “Special?  Because you were born lucky?  Some of us had to make our own kind of special.  Who the hell are you to tell me I’m not special?”
 
"Do you think it is gay if you want to have sex with yourself?  You know what, I don't care if it is.  I love me."
Gaston from “Beauty and the Beast”- “What right does a woman have to say ‘no’ to me?  I deserve her.  I deserve any and all of them.  I.  Am.  Gaston.”

Judge Frollo from “The Hunchback of Notre Dame”- “We are all so weak, so timid, so prone to corruption.  The lord made us so fragile and malleable.  It is the duty of all those who have the strength and constitution for gruesome tasks to make this world clean and bright.  Without sin.  Why too, am I so weak?”

Section 2: Methodology
            Many of these characters’ plans are stupid, or they have no plan and more or less fall into action.  So let’s just applaud the one’s whose plans either work or work well enough that you could call them a threat.

From weakest to strongest they are:

Gaston’s plan in “Beauty and the Beast” seems to be flirt with Belle until she gives into his manly magnetism.  He fails, and then gets a little rapey, followed by black mailing Belle by jailing her father.  Gaston, this is not a good plan.  Even if Belle does marry you, ultimately you are on the fast track her slicing your nuts off on the wedding night.  He doesn’t even know there is a Beast to kill until late in the 3rd act and decides to kill the Beast… for no reason.  Cause he is a dick.

I am so choked up right now.
Hades plan in “Hercules” is damn near fatally flawed from the word “go”.  I would go so far as to call it a plot hole bonanza.  Why would the Titans be useful in defeating all the gods when Zeus defeated them by his lonesome back in the day? Why would the chaotic and evil titans allow Hades to be in control of jack shit after managing to defeat the gods?  Why did you expend so-so many good resources trying to defeat Hercules?  WHY TRY TO FIGHT DESTINY AT ALL?  You're Greek, a god no less, you know how all of those stories workout.

            Ursula in “The Little Mermaid” has a plan that makes no sense and fails numerous times but for her cheating.  I understand that her wanting to... rule the sea?  Revenge on Triton?  Whatever requires her to leverage Ariel, but her spell should have been broken by her own cheating, how does a magically enforced bargain not break when good faith is violated?

Mother Gothel in “Tangled” seems to be under the false impression that she can manipulate and control a teenage girl forever.  The fact that she managed it as long as she did deserve props (and the fact that she tried to skip out on the child kidnapping altogether but couldn’t because the magic faded when not attached to a scalp, that was also smart).  But again, her entire ongoing strategy is child abuse of the most extreme variety that will inevitably break at the worst time.  Which it did.

Dr. Facilier AKA Shadow Man in “The Princess and the Frog” has a plan to take over New Orleans via the manipulation of one HIGHLY UNRELIABLE middle man.  I hate to be the one to criticize a man who has made deals with otherworldly forces, but the weakest link in your chain of schemes was the human you chose to work with.

Syndrome in “The Incredibles” seems to have all the bases covered.  He kills nearly all the heroes via a constantly evolving machine of death, he amasses huge resources via supporting third world dictators (stated not shown), and it set to announce his presence to the world thru a big coming out stunt.  Thing is, he also says he wants to sell super gadgets to make everyone into superheroes, to show the heroes of the world they are no longer special… Why not just do that?  People would buy force field projecting gloves and flight suits.  Why even with the plan?

"And all will see that I have the coolest shoulder pads in all the Caliphate!"
Jafar in “Aladdin” has been trying to run the show for years and has been doing so to one degree or another.  He uses hypnotism, he gathers resources, he plots midnight assassinations, and he tries to unlock the mysteries of the desert to take his place as the top.  Really, if he had just used his connections with the guards to kill the Sultan, marry Jasmin, rule the kingdom, and then search for the lamp with all his new free time he would have been better off.  I feel that the guards who were willing to murder a foreign dignitary at his behest would have been willing to murder a blundering Sultan for him too.  Call me crazy but he keeps trying to use too big a solution to the problem.  In the real world a lot of sultans got to be sultan because they killed the last sultan.

Judge Frollo in “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” wants to rid the world of sin by killing lots of gypsies.  Primarily because one of them makes him horny and we can’t have that.  Honestly, compared to the others his goal of, “have sex with attractive gypsy woman” contrasted with his legal/social power of “destroy a massive number of minorities” and the fact that he would willingly destroy the object of his affections rather than lose her… I can’t really see a flaw in his methods.  Maybe it is just overkill.  Really, what his goals are the problem, they are in conflict, he can’t be both free of sin and yet enjoy the sinning, so his methods are monstrous because he’s losing his god damned mind.

Scar in “The Lion King” manages the successful coup d'etat that Jafar should have just pulled.  Kill the king, frame the son, then kill the son.  Unfortunately, he has that same issue as many others: his minions suck at their jobs.  He ruled as a king for years and was only overthrown because his minions suddenly stopped sucking at murder and murdered him rather than fight Simba.  He was surrounded by idiots.

The Queen in “Snow White” has two plans.  Plan A: hire a murderer.  Plan B: when the initial murderer fails to have the stones to go thru with murdering a child put on a disguise and go to commit the murder yourself.  The only thing she didn’t plan was an effective escape from the scene.  But she has blunt and precise plans that would have worked if the first guy hadn’t fucked up or if she had foreseen the tiny angry mob.
 
"You want to know something funny?  They did invite me, I just hadn't checked behind the counter in the lobby where they leave the mail.  It had fallen back there.  Hahahahha.  For want of a nail, am I right?"
Maleficent in “Sleeping Beauty” aspires to being a dick in the most creative of fashions.  Destroy the nations textile industry by getting the king to get rid of all the spinning wheels, make them suffer when they can’t even keep the girl away from the curse, then make the prince suffer by having him in imprisonment so long that even if he does rescue sleeping beauty he will be an old man.  She is such a dick in such an elaborate fashion.  What is more, she is powerful to the point that people fear her from day one, her plan is exercising her own considerable power and abilities.  This is certainly why she is so well regarded by the Disney fandom.

Section 3: Final Confrontation
            There are more than a few people getting thrown off buildings or just off of high things in general.  Common Theme.  There are two that survive and they get bonus points for that.  I also give a bit of a bonus for there being some kind of thematic parallel or something clever.  Lower scores are for endings that might be summed up with, “and then the hero killed them”.

From weakest to strongest they are:

If I had to do it again, I would have planned it out a bit better.
 Ursula at the end of “The Little Mermaid” is 200 meters tall, and generating a storm from being absolutely crazy with power.  She is then justly murdered via stabbing while laughing like an idiot.

The Queen at the end of “Snow White” is being hunted by dwarves until ultimately being killed because she did not plan a proper escape route.

Jafar at the end of “Aladdin” HAS COMPLETELY WON, but rather than kill the hero and the sidekicks and then go off to rape Jasmin and make the Genie watch (AND THERE IS TOO MUCH OF THAT ON THE INTERNET) instead the world’s most powerful sorcerer allows himself to be goaded into wishing himself into being a genie, which made him a slave to his own lamp and unable to kill anyone.  So he is imprisoned for all eternity.  STUPID.  However: he lived.

Hades at the end of “Hercules” allows Hercules to perform the most obvious heroic sacrifice in history and thus leaves the door open for Hercules to become a god and win completely.  A final punctuation to the chain of horrible decisions that has defined Hades’ entire part in the movie.  He too, being a god, lives.

Scar at the end of “The Lion King” is eaten by his own duplicitous minions who are too hungry to rally behind him to win back the Pride Lands, which is no longer a prize worth having.

Maleficent at the end of “Sleeping Beauty” is stabbed in the chest by the hero and dies.  If not for the fact that she died giving it her all trying to be as evil and violent as possible right to the end she would have been much lower on this list.  She was trying to murder the hero right up to the end which leaves her ahead of the others.

Mother Gothel at the end of “Tangled” has Rapunzel’s lover at knife point at begs for the healing magic to keep her going.  Threats of more abuse and violence tinged with mad desperation at the fear of death that fills her.  She allows all the false platitudes to melt away and would be willing to keep Rapunzel in a cage for all eternity if necessary.  But, she is too late to help herself and fails to account for the willingness of one of the heroes to sacrifice their own life to secure the freedom of the other.  She fails because the heroes had each grown to defy her limited expectations of them.  Failing because the heroes beat you on a moral level is the best kind of loss for a villain.
 
I am in your house, stealing your baby, and I took an upper decker, good luck cleaning that.
Syndrome at the end of “The Incredibles” is about to steal a baby and raise it as his own.  You steal a baby that is about as evil as it gets.  And since the whole film is about family, the idea that the villain’s ultimate confrontation should take place in the family’s home, threatening the family’s (ostensibly) weakest member, and result in the destruction of that home leaving the family protecting each other as the only thing left—That is pretty epic.  It is only a fluke that Syndrome’s costume, intended to emulate and mock superheroes proves to be his downfall.

Gaston at the end of “Beauty and the Beast” this wins points for reasons that relate to the history of “Beauty and the Beast” as a story/movie (You can learn a bit more about it here, but it is a really long video on the subject).  In the live action version of “B&B” that in many parts inspired the Disney movie, the Gaston equivalent was played by the same actor that played Beast.  And the idea was on the conflict between masculine ideals and image.  That (for me) carries over to this movie quite well.  The idea that Gaston is the toxic masculine ideal being thrown away by Beast as he sheds his own rough outer monstrousness to become Prince Charming is rather resonant.

Judge Frollo at the end of “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” while trying to murder the heroes with a piece of the church they are clashing on, he falls into metaphorical hell as the city burns around them because of the siege on Notre Dame taking place.  It is the ultimate judgement from the Eyes of Notre Dame that have haunted Frollo thru the movie.  It has a lot going on.

Shadow Man at the end of “The Princess and the Frog” has a scene that is not loved enough.  Shadow Man knows the kind of racist bullshit that Tiana has to put up with, how hard she has to work, how much she has been put thru to get what she dreams of only to be told, “no” for the most thinly veiled of reasons.  So rather than try to kill her outright (something he could do, he is a big guy and she is a frog) he does the opposite, he offers her everything she deserves.  He offers her the rewards for all of her hard work that she has been denied.  I love it when the heroes are tempted to join the bad guys, and this is probably the best example of it in a family movie.  Only by rejecting all Tiana has wanted for higher ideals does Shadow Man fail to achieve victory at the last and is dragged to hell.

Section 4: Personality
            This is the most subjective section in an entirely subjective exercise.  And really.  They’re all good.  It is splitting numerous hairs here.  I would go into detail but it all would sound like, “They are cool in (some way) but not (other way)”.

From weakest to strongest they are:

The Queen from “Snow White”
Syndrome from “The Incredibles”
Jafar from “Aladdin”
Mother Gothel from “Tangled”
Dr. Facilier AKA Shadow Man from “The Princess and the Frog”

Just a little trick we do here in New Orleans.
Maleficent from “Sleeping Beauty”
Ursula from “The Little Mermaid”
Gaston from “Beauty and the Beast”
Scar from “The Lion King”
Judge Frollo from “The Hunchback of Notre Dame”
Hades from “Hercules”

Final Ranking:
The Queen from “Snow White” - 10
Ursula from “The Little Mermaid” - 10
Jafar from “Aladdin” - 14
Mother Gothel from “Tangled” -17
Hades from “Hercules” - 19
Syndrome from “The Incredibles” - 21
Scar from “The Lion King” - 21
Dr. Facilier AKA Shadow Man from “The Princess and the Frog” - 21
Gaston from “Beauty and the Beast” - 24
Maleficent from “Sleeping Beauty” - 26
Judge Frollo from “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” – 35
 
Claude Frollo.  As abusive to children as Mother Gothel.  As Egotistical as Scar.
As sexually threatening as Gaston.  And as organizationally skilled as Syndrome or Jafar.
            Let me just say, I did not expect Gaston or Maleficent to place so high.  They are not characters that spring immediately to mind with me.  But I figured Frollo would be really high, in my opinion he is the strongest element of his whole movie.  But then, who knows, I could do this again in a year or two and my world view would change all around and suddenly I would think that Hades should be on top.  It should be noted I ranked all the categories equally, if I had weighted them (AKA put in even MORE work on this blog) things would have been different.

            Share your own thoughts on this in the comments.  I know I am not the only person out there who is nostalgic for Disney products, and I am sure many people disagree with my selection for today’s entry.  Who is your favorite villain?  Why are they your favorite villain?  Are there some criteria I missed?  Is there a bad guy you think I scored unfairly?
Do you thinking ranking complex opinions numerically is stupid, and that complex opinions are too apt to be ranked in modern society instead of allowing them to be spelled out in a complex weave of emotions and preconceptions making us all too reliant on the veneer of legitimacy afforded by arbitrary quantitative scales to justify our feelings to the uncaring and disapproving masses???  If so you have a might pretty mind on you.  I respect that.

Main issue with group shots: Clashing animation styles.
I picked Disney stuff just because I knew there was so much of it to talk about and it lends itself to discussion in the comments.  So please, tell me how my opinion about cartoon movies is biased and how your opinion on cartoon movies is objectively right.

______________________________

If you like or hate this please take the time to comment, +1, share on Twitter, Tumblr, or Facebook, and otherwise distribute my opinion to the world.  I would appreciate it.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Favorite Video Game Antagonist

            I have not been posting nearly enough this year and I want to steer back from that.  To that end I have found a 30-day blog challenge and will be writing out entries, hopefully I can get all thirty days without any breaks, and if I manage to do that (since August has 31 days) I will think of an additional entry to write about.  I have done a 30-day challenge before, it for movies, but that was a while back, feel free to read those too if you like.

            Today is day 7 and the topic is “Favorite Video Game Antagonist”.
            I still feel unnerved hearing the voice of this character because in many ways it is the best example of bad research, toward a bad end, and without regard for those the research is done upon.
            “This was a triumph,” the voice said.  “I’m making a note here: Huge Success.”  Generally considered to be the biggest surprise hit and instant classic so far this century (not just in games, but I would argue fiction in general) “Portal” is the story of a young woman in a testing facility sent thru a series of tests to measure the effectiveness of a new gun that manipulates wormholes, but all the observation areas are empty, and the cold voice over the intercom is obviously that of a computer with a tenuous grip on how to speak to humans, only the promise of cake as a reward for surviving the gamut of deadly tests is what it offers in motivation.  And if there is anything you know from being on the internet it is this fucking meme: The Cake is a Lie.
I prefer savory dishes anyway.
            That voice is GLaDOS a giant supercomputer left in charge of the testing facility after some hinted at but never fully illuminated incident.  The manufacturing facilities at its disposal allow for the creation and placement of turrets, missile launchers, and neuro toxins.  GLaDOS’ nature is left more ambiguous until the second game, and while it does offer some more fleshing out of the insane and the evil business that led to the creation of such a device, I do not feel those explanations do anything to diminish the machine’s menace.  A bad beginning doesn’t make horrifying conduct toward your victims any less horrifying.
            Deeper than just the story, is the metaphor of what she represents, she is creating a game with the goal to kill the player thru endless trials, she is making the video game you are playing.  You are playing a game that HATES YOU.  And that is hilarious.
This game started out as a princess fleeing a demon.
            GLaDOS makes it onto a lot of lists on line and was #1 on two of the lists I found.  “Portal” is a game that managed to win the lottery for having a unique and amazing game mechanic in the portals themselves.  It had visual personality.  It had humor.  And it had GLaDOS as the antagonist.  It is a must play game.  If I were not already talking about it so much hear I would have put the game under the “A Game Everyone Should Play” blog entry coming later this month.  If you haven’t played it, keep in mind it is inexpensive on Steam, you can play thru the whole thing in about 4-6 hours, and if you like it the sequel is much larger in the range of 20-30 hours and has more of everything the first had to offer.

______________________________
If you like or hate this please take the time to comment, +1, share on Twitter, Tumblr, or Facebook, and otherwise distribute my opinion to the world.  I would appreciate it.


Friday, August 28, 2015

LootCrate "Villains 2"

            I have been getting LootCrate for 4 months now and this is the first time I had the bright idea to just post pictures of the stuff on this blog, I have no idea why as it is accessible content that appears regularly and my initial experience in getting the stuff was as a birthday present from my roommate so it makes for a good story about friendship… I guess I just blanked on it.  Regardless of past months, let’s look at the items this month.

            First up is a Los Pollo Hermanos kitchen apron from one of the best TV shows ever, “Breaking Bad”.  Since I do not cook this is one of those fun but impractical (for me) entries in the crate.  Most likely the use I will find for it is as a display medium for the numerous pins and buttons that come in a typical crate.

"Breaking Bad"
             These are this month’s button and pin.  It is standard for each loot crate to come with a themed pin (and often they come with pins from other franchises related to the theme).  This one is a villainous monster mouth.  The pin is a highlight of the box, a prop replica of those used in the movies.  While it does seem odd to wear the C’Thulhu esc emblem of a Nazi super-science cabal, it is still cool in spite of the Nazi connection.  Fun aside, the reason there were almost no “real Nazis” in the Captain America movies has to do with toy sales, it is really hard to sell toys that have swastikas on them.
            Next we have a wooden Joker Toy with a switchable face.  The arms, hands, and to a lesser extent the legs have movement and can be posed.  It is a quirky display item and I like it except for one issue: what do I do with the second face?  There is no storage slot or place to put the extra piece, so it is destined to get lost.  I still like it, stylized representations of characters are always cool.
            This is the highlight of the box, one of a pair of mugs, I of course got the Carnage mug.  Carnage being a popular villain character of the 90’s Dark Age of comics.  He is a symbiotic alien monster like Venom, but instead of being attached to a jock loser like Eddie Brock, Carnage instead attaches to a serial killer.  The murderer’s mania allows him to bond more perfectly with the alien and they go on several thrill killing adventures in the Marvel universe.  I don’t really like Carnage as a character, but the mug looks awesome.

"A gun that shoots good feelings"


            Lastly we have the LootCrate magazine and the box itself which depicts a Joker hideout where he is building a giant attack size version of the wooden toy.  The magazine is a little thin, it talks about each item and has an article about people in your own life whose toxic personalities might mimic those of Batman’s list of foes, kind of a heady article with a strange framing device.  The magazine’s real drawback is the use of dark red font on black backgrounds which makes some words hard to notice or read.
            The Box is actually badly designed.  There seems to be no logical way to fold it to show all the art it offers.  There are 6 surfaces with art, one is on the bottom of the box, and another is covered when it is folded into a box with the art facing out.  It almost works, but falls short.

            Overall I think the mug makes up for a lack of a t-shirt (I usually find the shirts to be the highlight of any crate) and the other stuff is of high quality and cleanly on theme.  Not a lot of clutter or fat to be cut.

______________________________

If you like or hate this please take the time to comment, +1, share on Twitter or Facebook, and otherwise distribute my opinion to the world.  I would appreciate it.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Hero vs. Protagonist

            People do not understand the terms, "Hero" and "Protagonist".  I keep hearing people describe Walter White of "Breaking Bad" as an Anti-Hero, mostly because he does criminal activity for understandable reasons.  Yeah he is not a "hero" at all.  He is a villain.  He is a villain protagonist.
            To be fair this is a problem created by a cultural norm started with a lot of older movies.  The norm was to portray the good guys in the protagonist role, giving them clear motivations, causing people to think that motivation = heroism, and that main character = hero.
            Truth is, bad guys have motivations, they make decisions just like everyone else in the world and can be motivated by simple or complex needs and desires just like a hero can be.  Luke Skywalker is a hero, he does the right thing for the right reasons (though gains complexity as he does endanger himself and his friends for the sake of trying to bring his father back to the light side), Han Solo starts as an anti villain, does the right thing for the wrong reasons (saving the princess for reward).
            On the other end is Walter White who starts as an anti-hero, doing a bad thing for a good reason (cooking meth to pay for his care and to leave his family something after his death), then moves into full blown villain as he does things out of pride and greed overlooking extreme violence or committing violent acts to continue with his criminal lifestyle even though he doesn't need to.
            Villain protagonists are not common and so people tend to call the main character the "hero" of the story when that is more and more not the case.  TV is a cluttered medium, and in order to gain traction with an audience TV is taking steps toward more and more violent, nefarious, or just evil characters.  This has made things much less heroic.
            Look at the nominations for best series, "Breaking Bad" (show about the complex world of drug dealing), "Homeland" (terrorism), "House of Cards" (political intrigue and dirty dealings), "Mad Men" (ADVERTISEMENTS, is there a greater evil?), "Game of Thrones" (Dark fantasy with mass murder as a series highlight), "Downton Abbey" (Classism and idol rich).  Compared with 2000: "ER" (doctors saving lives), "Law and Order" (cops and lawyers fighting crime), "The Practice" (more complex, lawyers seeking justice and paychecks), "The West Wing" (ultimate romanticized political drama), and "The Sopranos" (the mob).  Things have gotten a lot darker, with only a couple shows analogous to each other and most modern shows taking after the tone of "The Sopranos" more than any of the others.
 
I have cancer, that makes it okay for me to hurt people in the pursuit of massive wealth.
Just for my own amusement to illustrate my position I am going to list a few of each type of character alignment.
Hero (right thing, right reasons, right methods):
Movies: Luke Skywalker "Star Wars", Hercules "Disney's Hercules", Batman "The Dark Knight", Atticus Finch "To Kill a Mockingbird"
TV: President Bartlett and pretty much the whole cast of "The West Wing", Doctor Green and pretty much everyone from "ER", Ned Stark "Game of Thrones", Hank Schrader "Breaking Bad"
Comic Books: Superman "Superman", Captain Marvel "SHAZAM"

Anti Hero (right thing, questionable reasons, questionable methods)
Movies: Batman "Batman", James Bond "Skyfall", General Patton "Patton"
TV: Jack Bauer "24", Walter White "Breaking Bad" (Initially), Tyrion Lannister "Game of Thrones", Stannis Baratheon "Game of Thrones"
Comic Books: Wolverine "Uncanny X-Men", Jesse Custer "Preacher"

Anti Villain (wrong thing, right reasons, questionable methods)
Movies: Tyler Durden "Fight Club", Will Munny "Unforgiven", HAL 9000 "2001: A Space Odyssey"
TV: Saul Goodman "Breaking Bad", Theon Greyjoy "Game of Thrones" (Very Close to Villain)
Comic Books: Black Adam "52", The Authority "The Authority" (Initially Anti-Hero), Magneto "Uncanny X-Men"

Villain (wrong thing, wrong reasons, wrong methods)
Movies: Joker "The Dark Knight", Hannibal Lecter "The Silence of the Lambs",
TV: Tuco Salamanca "Breaking Bad", Walter White "Breaking Bad" (Later Seasons), Ramsay Snow "Game of Thrones", Gregor Clegane "Game of Thrones"

Comic Books: Apocalypse "Uncanny X-Men"