Action
GI Joe Retaliation, or "Why is the destruction of
London and the murder of millions taken so in stride?"
Overall: 5/10
Also, all of the posters are awful. They look like the covers to a generic shooter video game, this is the best one and it looks like it is advertising a discotheque. |
This movie
is about as good a film as we could have possibly expected considering how shit
the first one was. And since it ties up
all but one loose thread it will serve as a decent end to this current era of
GI Joe on the big screen... Probably.
They might make another one. I
don't really want them to.
The first
one suffered(?) from throwing in a lot of goofy stuff that I guess would have
been cool if the movie had not been about GI Joe and instead had just been
about super soldiers fighting some massive corporate-terrorism scam... Even
though the plot was stupid, the universe needlessly small, and the bad guys
were badly executed... Come to think of it this series shares a lot of issues
with the new "Star Trek" franchise but consistently has poorer direction (though better than the first one).
Actually
there are plenty of fun things in the movie, there is a massive cliff side
ninja battle that is a lot of fun, if the Ninja Turtles had shown up to lend a
hand and this had all been a giant set up for a shared universe between GI Joe
and their future movies it would have all but redeemed the thing. The Rock is fun, though the movie somewhat
contradicts itself with his skill level and unloads (rather than fires)
Chekhov's gun, the movie shows his ability with a massive firearm at the start
of the film and during the climax his skill fails to hit a much larger target,
I actually watched a review online that said they should have just had the Rock
play himself in the tradition of real life pro-wrestlers and fictional athletes being GI Joe's (like Sgt. Slaughter and Rocky).
But there
is so much needless crap in this movie, they have Cobra Commander in it and he
does nothing, they kill Destro without having ever had him standing outside of
a cage. They have Storm Shadow, who was
run through in the last movie back alive without any explanation. The climax of the film has the entire city of
London totally annihilated by a space based weapon... Millions are dead...
Beautiful to look at... Totally unnecessary, and actually really pissed me off
because it marks the second time a major city outside the United States has
suffered either near or total obliteration and it is not treated with the
gravity it should.
The film
cheapens itself, cheapens its characters, and makes less and less sense in its
own universe, mostly because it is just starting from a really bad place, the
first movie which knee capped any chance this thing of really functioning. Let's just let this series quietly expire in
the corner, and do something else with it later, cause it isn't working.
The Lone Ranger, or "This is a really uneven movie...
Which averages out in my opinion."
Overall: 6/10
There is maybe too much going on. |
Wasn't all
that bad. This movie is making a lot of,
"WORST MOVIE EVAR!" lists because it has a white man playing an
Indian, the titular character won't stop sucking, it is overly cynical, and the
tone is all over the map. Yeah... Can't
really argue with any of that, but I am reminded of something from Shakespeare
(yes I am mentioning the bard in a review of "The Lone Ranger").
If we shadows have offended,
Think but this, and all is mended,
That you have but slumber'd here
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream, -Puck
Think but this, and all is mended,
That you have but slumber'd here
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream, -Puck
And other science facts,
Just repeat to yourself "It's just a show,
I should really just relax
For Mystery Science Theater 3000. -MST3K
Just repeat to yourself "It's just a show,
I should really just relax
For Mystery Science Theater 3000. -MST3K
This entire
movie is told from the perspective of an aging, doddering, traumatized old
man... Tonto. The framing device of the
movie is Tonto telling the story of his first adventure with his friend the Lone Ranger to a young kid in a Wild West show attraction. And you know what happens in stories told by
old or silly people? They have a hard
time keeping things on track.
Tonto
throughout the story talks about things that are clearly too dark to be talking
to children about, (in one scene his entire race is slaughtered in a suicide
charge against the villain, and Tonto gets away, only to watch as bits of
feathers and native regalia wash down a river, his society is being washed
away. Then they make a joke about how
the Lone Ranger's horse acts funny... He does this because the old man Tonto is
telling this story and if he dwells too long on the sad parts either he or the
kid he is telling the story to is going to cry, so he breaks the tension with a
joke).
There is
also the issue of the "main character". The Lone Ranger is a naive overly optimistic
fool. At numerous opportunities he is
confronted with the man who killed his brother (a man also responsible for
killing a lot of Tonto's people), and rather than letting Tonto kill the guy,
he fights Tonto and takes the guy in to face trial... While knowing that the
system is corrupt and there is someone helping the outlaw from the inside. Of course the Ranger gets betrayed and nearly
killed. Actually, it could be said that
this movie's message is teaching one young attorney to chose the path of
violence and revenge because justice is a lie constructed by the rich so as to
more easily exploit those who are different from us... I can kind of get behind
that message... but then they frame it as, "I used to think that you were
the Wendigo (cannibal) but now I see you are just a white man." Really, Tonto? I know the movie could be saying that you no
longer believe that some supernatural evil is to blame that regular old greed
is to blame, but it makes it sound like white people are the problem rather
than say... That guy who did the crime...
That kind of pissed me off, we are supposed to be past that level of
liberal guilt.
I also liked the bird hat and the mystic weirdness. It was certainly memorable. Rather than ANOTHER iteration of these characters, they had their own iteration of these characters. |
There is
also another scene in which a military commander who was tricked into killing a
lot of innocent people refuses to believe that he was tricked, and just up and
decides to be a bad guy (metaphor for American military?) I guess they could be saying that rather than
admit that killing Indians is wrong we all just bought into the idea that they
had it coming? This movie throws a lot
of stuff out there with themes and ideas, but it does so in the context of some
old guy talking about how shit people were/are.
Could have
cut some stuff to make it work better, it was too long, really the whole
framing device of old Tanto was stupid and overly cynical, and the bad guys
make lots of bad decisions. But, there were a lot of fun gags, a lot of good
action, the costuming was good, and the dialogue never felt forced or
unrealistic. The movie was okay. Solidly okay... So long as you take it on its
own terms. It certainly was not one of
the worst films of the year. Nor was it nearly as bad as people led me to
believe.
Basically,
whenever the theme kicks in, I felt myself getting caught up in the action and
excitement.
No comments:
Post a Comment