Fantasy
... And a bit of an emphasis on Romance... To wildly different levels of success.
Oz: The Great and Powerful, or "My expectations...
They've all been blown away."
Overall: 8/10
It is a movie that really emphasizes "fun". |
One of the
best movie going experiences I had all year.
I did not
think James Franco was going to work... Turns out he really worked he had good
timing, clearly has mastered working with every manner of blue screen and
special effect in the industry as he talks with and handles CGI characters
easily and acts wowed at all the gorgeous visuals the movie offers. But Mila Kunis was... a less fitting match...
Something about her laugh didn't work for me.
I really
liked the visual change going from Kansas to Oz, not only from black and white
to color, but also from a narrow square screen to wide screen. I liked the goofy slapstick, and I liked the
supporting characters. Not a lot of
problems in this as it does everything one might want with a movie set in
Oz. It actually does something I wish
they would do with "The Hobbit" telling a story that is for the most
part original that ties into known events but mostly just does its own thing in
the universe.
Beautiful Creatures, or "Twilight, the Good
Version. Admittedly, not a high bar to
clear."
Overall: 6/10
Watch and marvel, as a film nearly makes up for its shortcomings. |
"Beautiful
Creatures" was picked up with the lowest possible expectations. I thought this was going to be nothing,
another movie given the go because of the Supernatural romance genre being a
thing. It was slightly more than
nothing. The male lead is interesting
and I can identify with him, he goes out of his way to be more interesting than
the people around him, reading banned books, targeting distant universities to
go to after graduating, and generally being up his own ass about how he is
better than the hicks that surround him (I am frequently up my own ass about
how stupid the people who surround me are).
The female
lead is pensive, as one would be knowing that there is a count down to her
either becoming a supervillain or not... I can imagine that being
stressful. Even though I will freely
admit that the idea that men in this universe get to chose whether they are
evil while women are slaves to their passions... Whatever.
The real
prize in this movie is Jeremy Irons walking around like gods gift to hammy
acting and there are really potent scenes in which he makes the male lead see
how his life will go nowhere and for all his blustering and pretentiousness he
is still just a hick with delusions of grandeur (again, I can relate to the
male lead). Irons also has an acting
competition with the whole town and then the main antagonist of the film in a
massive southern style assembly hall, like somebody said that Jeremy Irons was
going to call everyone out on their horse shit and everyone showed up... Irons is great and makes the movie worth
seeing... And that scene I mentioned in which he bawls out the main villain and
the whole town, the central figure of evil in the movie is played by Emma Thompson, who is a Southern "holier that thou" possessed by an evil
witch... WHICH MAKES ACTING HAPPEN.
I went in
expecting nothing and instead got a ham sandwich. Mind you I had to chew through some of the
lame aspects to get to the good scenes, but they are scenes worth watching.
Mortal Instruments: City of Bones (turned off), or
"Trite Modern Fantasy"
Overall: 1/10 (One of the worst movies I saw all year)
This movie can go fuck itself. |
I turned
this shit off. There are good ideas
certainly, I like that the protagonist is suddenly seeing a mysterious symbol
she can't stop drawing. I like that she
starts seeing magical and even horrific shit.
I like that she calls her Mom out on friend zoning her would be step
dad, and the Mom calls her out on friend zoning the nerdy guy who follows her
around (I actually found that to be hilarious, "Who taught you how to
emotionally string along boys?"
"YOU ALRIGHT! I learned it
from watching you!"). Though I will say that the Mom is well cast, Lena Headey is a good actress and looks a lot like the young protagonist (very expressive eyebrows on both of them).
But then
the whole thing starts to turn to shit.
The problem is that the whole thing could be wrapped up pretty quickly
if the magical blonde pretty boy would just explain to her what is going on
instead of demanding answers and obedience from a teenage girl who is obviously
confused and scared. He is a dick... and
thus is immediately a love interest. I
had been marathon-ing "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" the gold standard in
supernatural romance/action, and I kept thinking back to how Buffy would handle
the various situations, she would get answers, gather her resources, create a
plan, and then act.
Even when
outmatched and without a lot of information Buffy would take possession of the
situation and have agency in the story, the main character in this seems
totally out of her depth at the best of times and surrounded by people who will
not give her even the most basic of information. The whole point of having a fish out of water
protagonist is so that they can have things explained to them... and in turn
the audience can too. Logically as she
encounters new layers to the mystery
that surrounds her she should ask simple logical chains of questions that help
the audience keep pace with the narrative... But since nobody will tell her
anything in a coherent or non-confrontational way nobody knows what the fuck is
going on.
There is a
point in which she is in a room with a witch that knows her back story, and a
demon hunter that knows a lot about the world, perfect time for a quick set of
explanations to what has been seen without cryptic bullshit muddying the
waters. If you can't make the mystery
engaging without people being intentionally obtuse then your story is boring.
I gave this
movie a chance mostly because of "Beautiful Creatures" and "Warm Bodies" being alright. This
reminded me of what this sub-genre is about and why I will continue to not
bother watching "The Host".
No comments:
Post a Comment