Standard Introduction
I have been
writing about Dungeons and Dragons semi-regularly this year and in the course
of writing those I found a 30-day blog challenge. As I have done those a couple times before it
seemed remiss not to jump on this one.
If you want
here is a link to my 30-day
challenge on Disney Movies, here is a link to my 30-day
challenge on Video Games, and here is a comically out of date 30-day
challenge on Movies (it is old and the writing is rubbish).
Day 14- My Favorite Fiends
There are
10,000 monsters in this gods damned game.
Expect several top 5 lists this week as there are not too many specific
“favorites” more like “preferred”. Today
is Evil Outsiders. That will primarily
mean Demons, Devils, and Yugoloths.
Really, any
one of those species of evil could have its own top 5 and there are evil
monsters in the multiverse that aren’t of those groups. This is a massive category. I considered just talking about the biggest
of the big evil outsiders, with Demonic Princes and the Dukes of Hell, but in
my perspective, those tend to have too much coverage and emphasis. Better to, again, look at those monsters that
lend themselves to interesting encounters, interesting long term villainy, or
just have the coolest looks to them.
DOUBLE
TWIST, while writing this I decided to only do a Top 3 and then do a heavy
discussion about 2 “Dishonorable Mentions” because I think there is something
that needs to be talked about.
Let’s go.
This is a Vrock. A Vulture Demon. |
#3: Vrock
They fly,
they have spores, they look like the Skeksis from “Dark Crystal”, and they
scream so loud it physically stuns people.
In 3rd edition a group of them working together could create
a lighting explosion. What more could
you want from a giant demonic vulture thing?
Cause they kind of cornered the market on weirdness.
Anyone else recall the "Dark Crystal"? It was alright. Little too much enamored with the novelty of an all puppet movie. |
Like most
demons, Vrocks are dumb and guided entirely by self-interest to the point of
self-destructive behavior. I have used
them in the past but never to great effect.
I think that getting rid of the lightning explosion for 4th
and 5th edition was a wise move, it was a distracting ability
pulling them away from the more interesting shrieking and spore blasting.
This is a Kyton. They look awesome. |
#2: Kyton (Chain Devil)
This one
owes a lot of its success to the cool art.
Chains have numerous connotations related to domination both of one’s
self and others. At the same time chains
are analogous to sins, heavy and forged link by link (am I the only person who
remembers Jacob Marley’s speech to Ebenezer Scrooge about why his ghost was
covered in chains?). There is also just
the general kinkiness factor, I was surprised not to see all that much fan
artwork of the Chain Devil while pondering this blog entry.
The Kyton in
5th edition is all about making lots of attacks from numerous points
around the room by animating chains.
Like a cenobite from “Hellraiser” the chains become barbed and reach out
to touch people. They can also make
scary faces to frighten the PC’s, either by appearing as a loved one or hated
enemy, I kind of like that idea, the idea that your loved one ended up in a
kink dungeon in Hell and is now trying to kill you is kind of awesome.
I would like to make a suggestion that this sort of head cage should be used in future Kyton images. This seems like an obvious way for the whole "face of a loved one" could appear. |
4th
edition kind of stands apart in that he was more about moving around with lots
of attacks but I want to say that all iterations are missing something I always
assumed they had: A Climb speed. I guess
when I pictured these guys I see them as swinging from chain to chain, the
chains hanging from a place so high up that you can’t see it, and going down so
low that the bottom is cloaked in darkness, their victims twisted up in chains
like flies in spider silk. Oh well, my
mistake.
This is a "Horned Devil". Because if there is one trait that would be unique enough to comment on with DEVILS, it is the horns thing. No other Devil would have those. |
#1: Horned/War Devil (Cornugon/Malebranche)
This guy
has an interesting journey that consists primarily of being a big dude with a
trident. His art ALWAYS looks awesome
and that is really all I care about in regards to him. He is a big, solid boss monster that looks
cool.
I have no
idea why the names of this thing are so all over the place. In 3e it is a Horned Devil (Cornugon), in 4e
it is a War Devil (Malebranche), and in 5e it is a Horned Devil (Malebranche). I guess when 6e rolls/roles around (I am
guessing around 2022) it will be the War Devil (Cornugon).
This is a Sex Demon. This will be uncomfortable to talk about. Feel free to tell me I do not know what I am on about. |
Dishonorable Mentions (Cause Demons): Succubus and
Incubus
Yes, I need
to talk about the personification of sexual “seduction” that was a Demon in 3rd
edition, a devil in 4th edition, and in 5th… they “play
for both teams”. The Succubus is now not
just a sexy lady, but can also be a sexy fella in the form of an Incubus. I think this might illicit some criticism in
the form of, “Depraved Bisexual”. I
don’t think it does, but only because there are so many pansexual and bi-sexual
characters like Queen Morwel and arguably the rather gender ambiguous nature of
the Elf gods. Instead I want to talk
about a different issue that I feel is not clearly appreciated.
In 3rd
edition the Incubus was a separate demon from the Succubus. Making them one creature which has a term for
their female and male manifestations is a change for 5th edition…
Holy shit is it a change. And that is
the thing I want to talk about. Cause it
is something that kind of bothers me!
Like more than I realized when I started writing this blog about demons.
Let’s all
take a look at Dragon magazine #353 from March 2007, it was a month that
featured a cover illustration and focused article on the Demon Ruler of the
Succubi and on page 33 they had the 3e version of the Incubi. I will take an image DIRECTLY from there
along with the relevant roleplaying information. (Click for Full Size).
YEESH!
“The
Incubus is a physical manifestation of male sexuality given human form… Whereas
Succubi seduce their victims… Incubi see what they want and take it by
force.” They are RAPE DEMONS. OH MY!
Hash tag “Not all Demons” I suppose.
Take a look
at the combat description too. “They
gang up on single targets… Most incubi fight with a single longsword, often using
the weapon with both hands to strike their foes.” I can't be the only one thinking about that classroom scene from "The Wicker Man"?
Phallic Symbol! Phallic symbol!
Woof! Am I the one reading into this too much? I think the writer might not have thought it
out enough. 2007, a shockingly different
era now that I think about it. Here is
the thing though: The Succubus kissing someone into a mind controlled stupor
and then having sex with them, that is also a rape demon! It is just more of a date rape demon.
This is one
of those things that I sometimes feel people do not appreciate when talking
about these things in modern myth. It is
not good to be held down and fucked to death.
I find it strange that I have to be so blunt, but these things keep
cropping up in pop fiction. Morrigan from
“Darkstalkers” being the best example, but there are others, especially in
anime. These things that portray the
succubus as unironically seductive. That
is messed up.
They are
evil. They manipulate, use, and destroy
things. And, you know, rape, lots and
lots of rape. It’s an icky villain. I would recommend not using them. Because, they’re role is INTENSELY
misunderstood and weird.
Although... If that is what you are going for and you go for it hard enough. |
Coming Tomorrow
Tomorrow I
am going to talk about Celestials.
______________________________
If you
like or hate this please take the time to comment, +1, share on Twitter (click
that link to follow me), Tumblr, or
Facebook, and otherwise distribute my opinion to the world. I would
appreciate it.
No comments:
Post a Comment